|


Letter
# 72
Subj:
issues
page
Date: 03/01/2001 4:19:45 PM Pacific
Standard Time
From: Letter # 72- Las Vegas
To: dealers@nfge.com
Hi-
Las Vegas craps dealer here. Just found your website, and it's
very interesting. I checked the "issues" page and,
well...
This may come under the heading of "job security", but I
think it deserves at least a subheading. Many casinos here in
Vegas have what I like to call a "probationary release"
program. Basically, a dealer is hired then when within a week or
so of the end of the 90-day probationary period, is informed that
he/she is "not meeting the standards of service" and let
go.
This
is done in order to avoid paying insurance benefits. Many dealers
are, in fact, retained beyond the probationary period; it would be
impossible to keep the casinos fully staffed if everyone was let
go. It does seem, though, that many casinos have an extremely high
rate of turnover of probationary employees, too high to be
accounted for by poor dealing skills or bad customer service.
Also,
if a dealer is turning out to be a "problem employee",
this would most likely become apparent well before the 80th day of
employment, and certainly before the 89th day, which is the most
common point of "release". I understand that the
Mandalay Resorts/Circus Circus properties are notorious for this
practice, and the Flamingo Hilton and Imperial Palace also are
getting a reputation..
I personally was the victim of the "probationary
release" program at a Strip casino. I was about a week away
from completing my probationary period when I was informed that I
was "not meeting the standards of service" and let go. I
have talked to several people who have experience in casino
management who have told me that if I got past 80 days before I
was let go, the reason was most likely to get me out the door
before I became eligible for benefits.
If
there had been a problem with my job performance or customer
service, they wouldn't have kept me as long as they did. The
casino I worked at does seem to have an extremely high rate of
turnover of dealers who are within a week of making probation.
I have been surfing around your website and so far haven't found
any articles or letters covering this issue of casinos letting
dealers go just prior to the end of probation in order to avoid
giving benefits. Maybe I haven't looked around enough. But I think
this is an issue that needs to be brought out into the open. I
understand that there are no labor laws that protect probationary
employees.
Am
I correct in this? Also, are there any labor laws that would apply
to employers that have an extremely high rate of releasing
probationary employees within a week of the end of probation, long
past the time when any problems should have been identified and
dealt with?
Since I don't wish to endanger my future employment prospects by
attaching my name to a public airing of this issue, I remain-
Anonymous
Our
response....
Dear
Anonymous:
You ask if employees have any protection or recourse for the
"dump-at-the-end-of- probation" syndrome, a debilitating
disease strangely peculiar to the unorganized dealers of Las
Vegas......and I answer with an emphatic---NO, THEY DO NOT!
You also asked if there is any oversight of employers who practice
this heartless policy. Again, let me say sadly no. Unfortunately,
the powers that be in this state are only concerned with keeping
their cash cows happy and in working order, and have absolutely no
interest whatsoever in whether or not dealers are fired on their
89th day.
I say that every time they fire any one of us on the 89th day, it
hurts us all!
Jack Lipsman
NFGE
(Back
to Index)
|